According to a recent study by the TU Delft AiTech Institute, people seem to hold the human driver to be largely accountable when their (partially automated) vehicle crashes. According to the study, even though they are unable to reasonably prevent the collision, the motorist is still held primarily responsible.

Researchers from the TU Delft AiTech Institute looked into the apparent discrepancy between the public’s attribution of blame and findings from the human factors literature regarding humans’ ability to maintain alertness in partially automated driving in a paper that was recently published in Nature Scientific Reports. Despite being aware of the driver’s diminished ability to avert crashes, experiment participants predominantly blamed the driver for them.

A culpability gap is revealed by the disparity between human-factor-related issues with automation regarding driver competency and the participant’s accountability attributions. In this culpability gap, blame is not fairly allocated among the participating human agents; the driver bears the brunt of the criticism, which may be unfair considering how little they had to alter the outcome.

The research’s conclusions have repercussions. The research’s conclusions have repercussions. According to the participants’ reasoning, it appears that most of the participants do not assign responsibility for the aforesaid human-centered issues of automated driving in their public discourse. This would suggest that people are ignorant of the consequences of automation, which might result in “unwitting omissions.”

The research’s conclusions have repercussions. According to the participants’ reasoning, it appears that most of the participants do not assign responsibility for the aforesaid human-centered issues of automated driving in their public discourse. This would suggest that people are ignorant of the consequences of automation, which might result in “unwitting omissions.” Drivers are still regarded as responsible by their peers despite their ignorance of the effects of automated driving on their capacity to fulfil the necessary driving activities should the necessity arise. The researchers believe that both driver training and educating the public about the difficulties that automated driving poses for drivers will be beneficial.

 

ICAV Cluster is Smart City and CAV news aggregator. To add your Smart City or CAV related news, please email our editorial team on info@icavcluster.com